Sony RX100 VII vs iPhone 16 Pro: Can a Compact Camera Still Beat a Smartphone?

 Get the full story watching the video above ⬆️ 

People often tell me there’s no reason to own a compact camera anymore. Smartphones have gotten so good that for most people, they’re the only camera they ever touch. I get it, the iPhone 16 Pro is Apple’s most powerful phone yet, with multiple lenses, computational magic, and stabilization that makes almost any shot look smooth.

But I was curious: can it really replace a dedicated compact camera like the Sony RX100 VII? This little Sony has been around for a few years, but it’s still one of the most respected pocket-sized cameras on the market. So I decided to take both cameras out into the real world, city streets, golden hour, nighttime skylines, even some vlog-style shots, to see how they stack up.

Image Quality: Cinematic vs Polished

When I started comparing the footage, the first thing I noticed was the distinct difference between the two cameras.

The Sony RX100 VII tends to produce images that are darker, moodier, and more cinematic. Shadows stay rich, highlights roll off smoothly, and there’s a sense of depth that feels closer to what you’d expect from a bigger camera. If you’ve ever worked with log footage or spent time grading video, the RX100’s files remind me of that, flatter at first, but with tons of room to shape.

The iPhone 16 Pro takes a very different approach. Everything looks brighter, cleaner, and immediately ready to post. Its processing lifts midtones and colors, giving you a polished, almost “advertising ready” look right out of the box. That’s a huge advantage if you don’t want to spend time in editing. But sometimes, it crosses into looking processed, with skin tones or skies that feel a little exaggerated.

Take golden hour, for example. On the RX100, the images leaned darker and more dramatic. The iPhone kept things bright and cheerful, making details in the shadows easier to see, but it lost some of that cinematic atmosphere. Neither is wrong, it just depends on whether you prefer mood or visibility.

With skin tones, the RX100 stayed neutral and consistent, which I liked because it looked natural across different lighting conditions. The iPhone warmed everything up, which can be flattering, faces look healthier and sun-kissed, but sometimes it pushed too far and looked overly orange.

And when it came to stabilization, the iPhone was the clear winner. Walking shots looked silky smooth, almost gimbal-like. The RX100 held its own, but without running footage through Sony’s Catalyst software in post, the handheld shake was more noticeable.

User Experience: Control vs Convenience

Holding the two cameras side by side highlighted the differences in user experience just as much as image quality.

The RX100 VII feels like a real camera. It’s small, but you still get a solid grip, physical dials, and even a pop-up electronic viewfinder. Shooting with it slows me down, in a good way. I find myself thinking more about composition, exposure, and lens choice, because the camera invites that kind of control.

The iPhone 16 Pro is the complete opposite. It’s light, sleek, and always in your pocket. You just pull it out, tap record, and you’ve got usable footage instantly. That speed is unbeatable, but it comes with trade-offs. Everything happens through touch controls, which are fine for quick shooting but don’t give you the same tactile control as dedicated buttons and dials.

Zoom was another big dividing line. The RX100’s 24–200mm optical zoom gave me reach and sharpness that the iPhone just couldn’t match. The iPhone’s multiple lenses are impressive, especially with the new 5× telephoto, but once you push into digital zoom territory, softness and sharpening artifacts become obvious. The RX100, with real glass, simply resolves more detail at a distance.

Even handling in bright sunlight reminded me why compact cameras still matter. On the RX100, the electronic viewfinder made it easy to compose shots without fighting glare. On the iPhone, I was stuck with the screen, and in direct sun, it wasn’t always easy to see what I was framing.

There’s also the question of durability. The RX100 isn’t weather sealed, so I’m always cautious about rain or sand. The iPhone 16 Pro, with its IP68 rating, feels safer in those conditions. That peace of mind is no small thing if you travel or shoot outdoors a lot.

Where Each Camera Shines

After a few days of shooting, here’s how I’d sum it up:

•  The RX100 VII shines when you want cinematic control and optical quality. Its files have more depth, its zoom lens gives you flexibility, and the manual controls let you really shape your look. It feels like a tool for creating, not just capturing.
•  The iPhone 16 Pro shines when you want speed and convenience. Its stabilization, bright rendering, and instant shareability make it the easiest option for quick content creation. It’s perfect for vloggers, travelers, or anyone who wants results right away.

Final Thoughts

So, has the iPhone 16 Pro completely replaced compact cameras? Not in my experience. It’s incredible what Apple has achieved, a phone that can shoot stabilized 4K video in log and produce images that look professional with zero effort. But there’s still something special about the RX100 VII. Its one-inch sensor, optical zoom, and physical controls give you a level of creative control the iPhone just can’t replicate.

For me, the choice comes down to intent. If I’m heading out to really create something cinematic, I’ll reach for the RX100 VII. If I just want to capture life quickly and share it, the iPhone 16 Pro wins every time.

At the end of the day, both cameras impressed me, but in very different ways. And honestly, that’s the beauty of shooting in 2025, you don’t have to choose just one. You can keep a compact camera for when you want to craft your vision, and rely on the smartphone that’s already in your pocket for everything else.